Subject: Re: [xsl] How to 'execute' a table without manually converting it to a bunch of nested if-then-else statements? From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 18:28:15 -0000 |
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:20:34PM -0000, Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx scripsit: > By "better" I mean more assuredness that the code > faithfully/accurately encodes the table. First thing is "is there a function already?" For example, there's no general printf in XPath, but there are format-date(), format-integer(), and format-number(). > So, what I seek from you is this: How do *you* translate tables into code? Do > you have a way that is 100% guaranteed to faithfully/accurately encode the > table? Generally, maps. Sometimes maps-of-maps. -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] How to 'execute' a table with, Roger L Costello cos | Thread | Re: [xsl] How to 'execute' a table , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
[xsl] How to 'execute' a table with, Roger L Costello cos | Date | Re: [xsl] How to 'execute' a table , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |