|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is the first preceding-sibling a processing-instruction? From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:55:35 -0000 |
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:37:45PM -0000, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit:
> But you could do
>
> preceding-sibling::node()[not(self::text())][1][self::processing-instruction()]
I would use
preceding-sibling::processing-instruction()[1]
And I think it means "of my preceding siblings nodes which have node
type processing instruction, I want the one closest to me".
Have I got that wrong? Or is it only wanted if there's no intervening
node that's not a white space only text node?
--
Graydon Saunders | graydonish@xxxxxxxxx
^fs oferiode, pisses swa mfg.
-- Deor ("That passed, so may this.")
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Is the first preceding-si, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is the first preceding-si, Eliot Kimber eliot.k |
| Re: [xsl] Is the first preceding-si, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Is the first preceding-si, Eliot Kimber eliot.k |
| Month |