Subject: Re: [xsl] Bug in Saxon? From: "Michael Kay michaelkay90@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:57:00 -0000 |
The software is working as designed, and it's in conformance with the spec. Warnings tend to attract strong opinions, some people value them and others don't. Some people have a self-imposed rule that the code must execute without warnings, and by doing that they are making life a bit more difficult for themselves. There are plenty of facilities for suppressing warnings, either generally or very specifically. If you have a line of code that will always fail if executed, such as xs:integer("XYZ"), I think that's grounds for a warning, even if the logic ensures that it isn't executed. In fact having code that can never be executed is grounds for a warning as well. My IDE (IntelliJ) gives me lots of similar warnings for my Java code (unreachable code, conditions that will always be false, casts that can never succeed, expressions that might give an NPE, etc.) On the whole I find that these are helpful: they enable me to improve the quality of my code. Of course there are cases where you want to ignore the warning, for example code that is deliberately unreachable because you've put it in an "if (false)" block. It's an area where you can't please everyone all of the time. Michael Kay Saxonica > On 7 Aug 2024, at 14:09, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 07/08/2024 15:00, Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:costello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Okay, I upgraded to saxon-ee-12.5.jar and I get the same warning message. When I run my actual program, I get dozens of these warning messages until finally I get a message bNo more warnings will be displayedb Turning off warning messages is not acceptable. > > The bogus warning seems a bug in 12(.5) EE, I don't see it with HE. That suggests you might be able to get rid of it by suppressing some optimizations EE does but I haven't tried to figure out which one(s) that might be. > > > > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/3500899> (by email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Bug in Saxon?, Martin Honnen martin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Bug in Saxon?, Norm Tovey-Walsh ndw |
Re: [xsl] Daisy chaining XSLT and a, Paul Tyson phtyson@x | Date | Re: [xsl] Daisy chaining XSLT and a, Michael Kay michaelk |
Month |