Subject: Re: [xsl] Why do some people not use XSLT to process XML-formatted data? From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:30:45 -0000 |
> I don't understand why anyone would not use XSLT to process XML documents. The XSLT language was explicitly designed for processing XML documents, i.e., XSLT is a domain specific language (DSL). When a DSL exists, shouldn't it always be chosen over a general-purpose language such as Java? People use data binding for two reasons: (a) it avoids the need to learn yet another language, and (b) it make it easier to integrate the XML-processing part of the application with other parts that are written in Java for other reasons. And I agree with you, these are often poor reasons. In particular, they make it much harder to take advantage the "semi-structured" nature of XML, and its inherent potential for handling variety and change. > > SAXON processes XSLT using Java. Why? Why doesn't SAXON use XSLT to process XSLT? Should I infer that the XSLT language is not powerful enough with certain types of programming? > I have written a number of papers over the years on the potential for writing an XSLT processor in XSLT: see for example https://www.saxonica.com/papers/xmlprague-2019mhk.pdf The main difficulty in doing it is the limited set of data structures available in the XDM data model. XSLT has always been designed as a special-purpose programming language rather than a general-purpose language, and writing compilers is not one of those special purposes. We do however have the front-end of an XSLT compiler written in XSLT as part of the SaxonJS product. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Why do some people not use XS, Roger L Costello cos | Thread | Re: [xsl] Why do some people not us, Alan Painter alan.pa |
[xsl] Why do some people not use XS, Roger L Costello cos | Date | Re: [xsl] Why do some people not us, Alan Painter alan.pa |
Month |