Subject: [xsl] What types of programming problems is XSLT designed for? From: "Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:02:00 -0000 |
Yesterday Michael Kay wrote: ---------------------------------------------- XSLT has always been designed as a special-purpose programming language rather than a general-purpose language, and writing compilers is not one of those special purposes. ---------------------------------------------- I understand that XSLT is a special-purpose programming language and not a general-purpose language. But I always thought that "special-purpose" meant that XSLT was designed to efficiently process XML-formatted data, whereas a "general-purpose language" can process data in any format (albeit without much efficiency). I always thought, "If the input is formatted as XML, then use XSLT. Period. It doesn't matter what the application is." But Michael says that is not correct. He says that, for certain applications, even though the input is formatted as XML, XSLT is not suitable. For instance, if the application is an XSLT processor (such as SAXON), then XSLT is not a suitable language. Assuming the input is formatted as XML, what types of programming problems is XSLT designed for and what types of programming problems is XSLT not designed for?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Why do some people not us, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] What types of programming, rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Re: [xsl] Why do some people not us, Martin Honnen martin | Date | Re: [xsl] What types of programming, rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Month |