Subject: Re: [xsl] json-to-xml namespace From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:36:51 -0000 |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 8:48b/AM Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The XML representation of JSON that XSLT 3 and XPath 3.1 define and share puts those elements into that namespace, like most XML vocabularies use a namespace. Wow. That's a shockingly bad choice of namespace URL, as if namespaces weren't confusing enough already. Let's take elements that are neither XPath nor a function and put them in the xpath-functions namespace. Did nobody raise an issue here when the spec was written? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] json-to-xml namespace, Andre Cusson akhu01@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] json-to-xml namespace, Martin Honnen martin |
Re: [xsl] json-to-xml namespace, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Date | Re: [xsl] json-to-xml namespace, Martin Honnen martin |
Month |