Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT is a pattern-action language. So is AWK. What others? From: "russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx russurquhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:19:39 -0000 |
I love Snobol/Spitbol and have used it from my college days to the present for text processing of non-xml files. I love it and am so confortable with using it. As I learned Snobol before GREP was available, I never go into Regular expression very much. I'm not sure what you mean that there are no syntax errors in Snobol. When I first started learning it, and every so often now, I can generate a syntax error. for example, forget to close a quote character around a string, etc that'll generate an error, or did you mean something else? Thanks, Russ On Wednesday, December 11, 2024 at 06:48:30 AM CST, Michael Kay michaelkay90@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: What I hated about SNOBOL (in 1979? 1978?) was that there was no such thing as a syntax error.B Regular expressions seem to have inherited that tradition. Michael KaySaxonicaXSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe(by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT is a pattern-action , Michael Kay michaelk | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT is a pattern-action , G. Ken Holman g.ken. |
Re: [xsl] XSLT is a pattern-action , Michael Kay michaelk | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT is a pattern-action , G. Ken Holman g.ken. |
Month |