Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping with siblings From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 04:06:40 -0000 |
On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 00:12 +0000, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx wrote: > > > > > On 16/02/2025 01:00, Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2025-02-15 at 20:49 +0000, rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > Thank you very much Martin. That got me going in the right direction. > > > > > > > A quick note - in some cases group-by won't work well. An example can > > > > > > > It was group-starting-with in the posted code, both the original and > the suggestion I made (actually the code I spelled out used only > group-starting-with but I also said that the existence of start and > end marker elements kind of asked for the group-starting-with to wrap > a group-ending-with. Yes, your approach was fine for the posterbs case, as i said. Itbs for when they try to take that approach to other applications. Sorry if i wasnbt clear. Best, liam -- Liam Quin,B https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: B http://www.fromoldbooks.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Grouping with siblings, Martin Honnen martin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping with siblings, Terry Badger terry_b |
Re: [xsl] Grouping with siblings, Martin Honnen martin | Date | [xsl] [ANN] Calling Users of XML, X, B Tommie Usdin btusd |
Month |