Subject: Re: [xsl] Help, my problem is n-cubed ... and so is my XSLT code From: "Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:49:15 -0000 |
On 14/03/2025 17:37, Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 04:26:54PM -0000, Michael Kaymichaelkay90@xxxxxxxxx scripsit: >> Three options: >> >> (a) use xsl:key >> >> (b) use an XSLT processor that optimizes joins (such as Saxon-EE) (but you may need to write the search using predicates, not using xsl:for-each and xsl:if) >> >> (c) build your own indexes as maps, as you suggest. > Tangentially, is there a use case where xsl:key is expected to be > preferable in performance terms to using maps? I would still think that XSLT 3 with composite keys xsl:key name="key-name" match="foo" use="bar, baz" composite="yes" is easier than doing that with a map.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Help, my problem is n-cub, Michael Kay michaelk | Thread | Re: [xsl] Help, my problem is n-cub, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Help, my problem is n-cub, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Json to xml, dvint@xxxxxxxxx |
Month |