Subject: SPARC white paper From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:55:23 -0700 |
I was pleased to see the link to the SPARC white paper on reconstituting the process of scholarly communications. Does it not concern anyone, however, that the paper apparently reflects no awareness of what a publisher actually does? The paper seems to think of publishing as production (no) and distribution (no). It's really about identifying opportunities and filtering raw content. By analogy, publishing is to the process of scholarly communications what the admissions office is to an elite undergraduate institution. Without someone whose job it is to say no, reconstituted communications schemes will be awash in material (as though we weren't already, but it can and will get worse), which will in turn give rise to new entities, whose task it will be to guide selection. We may not call these new entities publishers, but that's what they will be. Nothing I have written here is in defense of the price-gouging, anti-innovative business strategies of some leading publishers of academic journals. One can defend the role of publishers without asserting that any of the current practitioners are doing a good job. Joe Joseph J. Esposito Portable CEO 613 Spring St. Santa Cruz, CA 95060 espositoj@xxxxxxx (831) 425-1143 (831) 254-0306 mobile
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
SPARC Position Paper: The Case for , Stevan Harnad | Thread | Re: SPARC white paper, Downes, Stephen |
SPARC Position Paper: The Case for , Stevan Harnad | Date | Call for Papers - New Technologies , Olga Francois |
Month |