Subject: Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Archiving is Not Prior Publication" (fwd) From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:56:58 +0100 (BST) |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:55:11 +0100 From: Charles Oppenheim <C.Oppenheim@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: September 1998 American Scientist Forum <SEPTEMBER98-FORUM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: SEPTEMBER98-FORUM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Archiving is Not Prior Publication" "The law does not recognize moral ownership" may be true in a backward (in Moral Rights terms) country like the USA, but Moral Rights are enshrined in the law of many countries of the world. Professor Charles Oppenheim Department of Information Science Loughborough University Loughborough Leics LE11 3TU 01509-223065 (fax) 01509-223053 ----- Original Message ----- > >sh> i.e., the fact that it is they who wrote them and not someone else -- > >sh> is of course retained by these special authors, as by all authors. But > >sh> the texts themselves are all given away; not a penny of royalties or > >sh> fees or other form of income from their sale/rental/lease/lending is > >sh> received or sought by their authors. > >sh> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm#5 > > >jr> The law does not recognize "moral ownership". You are making it up. > > Call it whatever you like: It is what you are violating when you > plagiarize. (And I'm not sure the authors of public-domain works are > protected from it.) > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm#5 > > Stevan Harnad
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
In The News, Olga Francois | Thread | Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Stevan Harnad |
Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Stevan Harnad | Date | Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Stevan Harnad |
Month |