Subject: RE: Question About Music Copyright (By Mitchell) From: "Olga Francois" <ofrancois@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:16:08 -0500 |
Subject: RE: Question About Music Copyright Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:49:03 -0500 From: "John T. Mitchell" <jmitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Max.Hyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tedforrl@xxxxxxx>, <digital-copyright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To either complicate or simplify - I'm not sure which - let me point out that the students may be right if there are talking about music, and wrong if talking about audiovisual works. The distinction is the result of Section 1008 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which states: "No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings." Those whose copyrights would otherwise have been infringed are compensated by a royalty on the sale of blank digital audio recording media and devices. John _________________ John T. Mitchell Legal Director Public Knowledge Soon to be at: John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1-202-415-9213 http://InteractionLaw.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Question About Music Copyright-, Max . Hyre | Thread | Distance Learning and Copyright, Stevan Harnad |
RE: Question About Music Copyright-, Max . Hyre | Date | In The News, Olga Francois |
Month |