Subject: Eric Eldrid Act From: "Neal Pomea" <npomea@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 08:22:02 -0500 |
Reposted from cni-copyright@xxxxxxx: Subject: The Eric Eldred Act Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 13:46:22 -0500 From: Eric Eldred <ericeldred@xxxxxxx> Reply-To: cni-copyright@xxxxxxx To: Multiple recipients of list <cni-copyright@xxxxxxx> In response to the stunning decision in Eldred v. Ashcroft, we have come up with an idea that we would like discussed here. It is for a tiny tax on works in the 50th year of copyright. If the tax is not paid, the work would enter the public domain. Thus works with no commercial value would enter the public domain much as they would earlier when the term expired. Works with commercial value would be paid for and would enjoy the current copyright term. The tax could go to support the registration process. Maybe 50 years of copyright is too long. The Economist has spoken out for a 14 year renewable term. But we recognize we have to make significant compromises with the strong copyright interests in Hollywood in order to persuade Congress about the benefits of this proposed act. For more information, please see http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/EAFAQ.html What do you think? ____ "Eric" Eric Eldred mailto:ericeldred@xxxxxxx http://www.eldritchpress.org "Eldritch Press" -- Neal Pomea Information and Library Services University of Maryland University College 3501 University Blvd. East Adelphi, MD 20783 Phone: 301-985-7579 or 1-800-283-6832, ext. 7209 Fax: 301-985-7870 npomea@xxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
UNIVERSAL INDEX OF DOCTORAL DISSERT, Daniel Vainstub | Thread | RE: Eric Eldrid Act, Downes, Stephen |
UNIVERSAL INDEX OF DOCTORAL DISSERT, Daniel Vainstub | Date | In The News, Olga Francois |
Month |