Subject: DMCA and Copyright Notice From: "Catherine Hogan Smith" <khogan@xxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:17:10 -0600 |
In 17 USC 108 as revised by the DMCA, there is a section pertaining to the notice of copyright that libraries are required to include on any copies made on behalf of their users. The section reads as follows: "Except as otherwise provided in this title and notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for a library or archives, or any of its employees acting within the scope of their employment, to reproduce no more than one copy or phonorecord of a work...or to distribute such copy or phonorecord, under the conditions specified by this section, if -- ...(3) the reproduction or distribution of the work includes *a notice of copyright that appears on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced* under the provisions of this section, or includes a legend stating that the work may be protected by copyright if no such notice can be found on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section. " I added the asterisks to point up the section in question - does this mean that we now have to state on the copy that the work has a "copyright 2000" or whatever designation on it, instead of relying on our blanket stamp giving notice that the work copied may be protected by copyright? Or am I misreading that section? Any advice will be appreciated. Kay Kay Hogan Smith, Asst. Professor/Librarian UAB Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences LHL 110 - 1700 University Blvd. 1530 3rd Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35294-0013 205-934-2231 205-975-8313 FAX khogan@xxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Version 47, Scholarly Electronic Pu, Charles W. Bailey, J | Thread | DMCA and Copyright Notice, Margaret Ellingson |
Version 47, Scholarly Electronic Pu, Charles W. Bailey, J | Date | In The News, Olga Francois |
Month |