Subject: spam? From: "jesposito" <jesposito@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 08:32:51 -0700 |
>Isn't this by definition Unsolicited, Commercial, Bulk, Email spam? JE: No, it's not, offensive though it may be. Instant messaging is, by definition, not email. If nothing is being sold, it is a stretch to call it commercial. And to call it unsolicited is to obscure the fact that members of these communities make themselves available for unsolicited communications. It may be that such communities will become "gated" in time, requiring proof of membership and insisting that only certain kinds of communications are permissible (e.g., no legal warnings, no pornography, etc.). An adjuct to this is that such gated communities would be in a good position to negotiate with copyright holders for community-wide content licenses, much as university libraries do now for academic research data. This would reduce the cost of copyrighted material by lowering the cost of sales (because a vendor gets potentially millions of users with one sales agreement). Joseph J. Esposito
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
What customers want in DRM., Hamaker, Chuck | Thread | [Fwd: Copyright and SPAM] by Cole, Olga Francois |
What customers want in DRM., Hamaker, Chuck | Date | [Fwd: Copyright and SPAM] by Cole, Olga Francois |
Month |