Subject: Straw man argument From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:19:25 -0700 |
Well, not really. It's not just the artists who make money from bestselling CDs. The bulk (in some cases, all) the profit of recording companies comes from a small number of bestsellers. The profit on those titles goes to subsidize the rest of the list. It's the same in trade books: One bestseller by Hillary Clinton or J.K. Rowling underwrites a huge amount of the overhead for the entire publishing program. The money to explore and develop new artists essentially is a subsidy from the established major artists. The current system thus tends to redistribute income from the bestsellers to the smaller titles. This is the precise opposite of the popular perception, but the popular perception is wrong. At risk in file-sharing is the research and development money for new artists. That's the real price. Prince and Madonna (and Courtney Love) can thumb their noses at record labels, but the unknown artists have a tougher time. Clearly many people now believe that that is a price they are willing to pay. Joe Esposito
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
copyright humour, Picciotto, Sol | Thread | Re: Straw man argument, Adam Kessel |
copyright humour, Picciotto, Sol | Date | About copyright humor, Marcia Keyser |
Month |