Subject: Issue re: Database and Collections of Information Act of 2003 (H.R. 3261) From: clarkjc@xxxxxxx Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:26:14 -0500 |
List colleagues, I have another question to pose (so soon! so soon!), this time in relation to the current H.R. 3261: http://www.haledorr.com/files/upload/data_collections_act_2003 .pdf In my reading of this legislation, I have some concern that included under its database protection could be copyrighted works or (now) public domain works (that formerly were copyrighted). The definitions of "collective works" and "compilations"-- which are cited as exceptions to "works of authorship" not covered by H.R. 3261--seem to me to allow sufficient interpretive leeway that authored works (most logically those subject to copyright) could be included within the larger authored work that qualifies as a "database" receiving the legislation's protection. Because Sec. 6 ("Other rights not affected") mentions "copyright" specifically, in regard to rights/limitations/remedies that interact with the legislation, this seems to reinforce the assumption, at least to me. But I have not yet read any commentary on H.R. 3261 that specifically addresses anything like this. Have I missed it, or am I completely wrong in this suspicion? Jeff =========== Jeff Clark Director Media Resources MSC 1701 James Madison University Harrisonburg VA 22807 clarkjc@xxxxxxx (email) 540-568-6770 (phone) 540-568-7037 (fax)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[Fwd: EFFector 17.7: Court Overturn, Olga Francois | Thread | Issue re: Database and Collections , Samuel Trosow |
In The News, Olga Francois | Date | In The News, Olga Francois |
Month |