Subject: Penalty for Posting Article on Faculty Website From: Herb Safford <herb.safford@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:31:11 -0600 |
Greetings! A university faculty member posted on his web site a short article [not a pointer to the article] which he had found published on their website by a commercial firm [by subscription - not clear whether they charge for subscriptions]. The author of the article, whose permission to publish on our faculty member's web site had not been sought or granted, discovered this posting, and has asked for reimbursement for what she believes to be a violation of her copyright. [Following notification by the author, the faculty member removed the item from his web site.] The questions we face now are: 1] the legitimacy of her request for payment, and 2] the fairness of the amount she requests in compensation for this violation of her copyright. So far as we can tell, she is correct that her copyright was violated. That being the case, we are inclined to be responsive to her request for compensation. This leaves us with the question of how to determine if the amount she deems fair compensation is, indeed, fair. We thought that an analogy to the cost of reprints might be helpful, but those costs vary considerably, and, on further reflection, it is not clear that the analogy between a reprint of a paper article and a posting on the WWW holds. Short of "going to court," does anyone have any knowledge or suggestions which might be helpful in determining what is fair compensation for the author? Any other observations concerning this sort of situation? Thank you! Dr. Herbert D. Safford Information Librarian & Bibliographer Grant Coordinator Rod Library University of Northern Iowa Herb.Safford@xxxxxxx (319) 273-3711
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Reminder: Digital Licensing Online, Kim Nayyer | Thread | RE: SPAM: Penalty for Posting Artic, John T. Mitchell |
In The News, Olga Francois | Date | copyrighting colors?, Paul Adams |
Month |