Subject: In the News From: "Jack Boeve" <JBoeve@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:12:37 -0400 |
========================================== RECENT ITEMS FROM THE CIP COLLECTANEA BLOG: ------------------------------------------ Blog: Works Made for Hire; Law Made for Confusion. By Kenny Crews, Collectanea, May 15, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/3wxkfz In my entry about Orphan Works, I used the example of the stranger who takes a picture of the family at the Grand Canyon. One reader asked: "Couldn't you just consider the photograph a 'work for hire,' as you 'employed' the stranger to take it on your behalf?" (First, I hope and trust that my copying of that sentence is within fair use, I hope and trust.... Moving on...) the law of WMFH is highly counter-intuitive. --------------------- Blog: Orphan Works: A Rant. By Kenny Crews, Collectanea, May 12, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/528uhq I went to the Grand Canyon and found a copyright dilemma. I will explain. Much has has been written about the Orphan Works bills that were introduced into Congress in recent weeks. A simple Internet search will connect you to the bills themselves and a host of opinions about them. --------------------- Blog: Yoko Ono Lennon, as an artist, on the wrong side of a fair use claim? By Georgia Harper, Collectanea, May 14, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/44p968 Anthony Falzone posts at Stanford's Center for Internet and Society that the Center will represent the producers of the controversial film, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed: Fair Use Project to Represent Premise Media Against Yoko Ono Lennon and EMI Records. The plaintiffs in this case want an injunction and they want the 15 second clip of John Lennon's "Imagine" removed from the film. No mention of damages. ========================================== IN OTHER NEWS: ------------------------------------------ Little Orphan Artworks. By Lawrence Lessig, New York Times, May 20, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/3kvtfm Congress is considering a major reform of copyright law intended to solve the problem of "orphan works" - those works whose owner cannot be found. This "reform" would be an amazingly onerous and inefficient change, which would unfairly and unnecessarily burden copyright holders with little return to the public. ------------------------------------------ Blog: In defense of ample copyright. By Megan McArdle, The Atlantic, May 19, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/5vzj3s My understanding is that the French took a stronger line on IP precisely because the abolishment of copyright around the time of the French Revolution had bankrupted much of the publishing industry and resulted in a race to the bottom that destroyed the market for new works; commission a book, and if it failed you'd take the loss, whereas if it succeeded, your rivals would copy it within weeks. ------------------------------------------ Blog: What Is A Fair Copyright Term? By Alex Knapp, OutsideTheBeltway, May 19, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/3uu4sp Without defending our current copyright terms, I think that this demonstrates a complete ignorance of the IP world today. This is not medieval England. It only takes a handful of real world examples to demonstrate that. ------------------------------------------ Blog: College Allows File-Sharing for Students Who Ace Copyright Law Test. ZeroPaid.com, May 19, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/42ggqo Missouri University of Science and Technology, in Rolla, enables P2P access for 6 hours on a user's on-campus registered PC if they get a perfect score on a copyright infringement quiz. ------------------------------------------ Iran should sign intl. copyright treaties: publisher. MehrNews.com, May 19, 2008. http://www.mehrnews.ir/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=686275 The managing director of Iran's Qoqnus publishing company said that Iranian publishing companies face problems because of the infringement of copyrights in Iran. "International authors do not trust Iranian publishing companies, and this is one of the consequences of the violation of copyright laws in Iran," Amir Hosseinzadegan told MNA on Monday. ------------------------------------------ Who needs copyright, anyway? By John Degen, Globe and Mail, May 17, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/3enr4h Canada is locked in an epic and bloody war over copyright, or so we're led to believe. Corporations, consumers and artists fight over new technologies and the content they deliver. I used to believe in this war myself, even fancied myself a bit of a warrior. But recently, the noise of battle has begun to sound more and more inconsequential, like an argument over directions between two people without a map. In fact, there is no great copyright crisis in our culture. The panic is false. ------------------------------------------ Blog: Danish Copyright Censorship Proposal Revealed. By Ben Jones, TorrentFreak, May 17, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/6dcx63 In February a Danish court forced ISP Tele2 to block its subscribers from accessing The Pirate Bay, following a similar order late last year to block allofmp3.com. A new proposal before the Danish government would mean that such actions would be quick and easy to do, without the need for a single court hearing. ------------------------------------------ Japan uses copyright conviction to crack down on student who allegedly spread computer virus. AP Digital/The Age, May 16, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/5xtbya A student who had allegedly spread a computer virus was convicted Friday of copyright infringement charges in a case that has highlighted the lack of laws in Japan to police malicious programs in cyberspace. ------------------------------------------ RIAA Setback: Making Music Available May Not Be Copyright Infringement. By Thomas Claburn, InformationWeek, May 15, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/6fpapn A district judge may order a new trial in a music file-sharing suit that won record companies $222,000 for copyright infringement. The act of making music available online may not be a copyright violation after all. And if that's the case, Jammie Thomas of Minnesota may not have to pay the $222,000 judgment won by record companies last year, an amount Thomas' attorneys argue is unconstitutionally excessive. ------------------------------------------ Starbucks Sued for Breach of Music Copyright. Chosun Ilbo, May 15, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/5l8oa4 The Korea Music Copyright Association filed a lawsuit against Starbucks Coffee Korea on Wednesday, demanding the chain pay copyright fees for the music played in its outlets. ------------------------------------------ Blog: "Happy Birthday to You" copyright in dispute. By John Lucas, Straight.com, May 15, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/4gpx83 Ever wonder why, during birthday scenes in movies and TV shows, you never hear anyone singing "Happy Birthday to You"? It's because producers are loath to pay the hefty licensing fees (reportedly as high as US$10,000) for the four-line ditty, the rights to which are owned by Warner/Chappell Music and the descendants of the song's authors, Mildred and Patty Hill... or are they? ------------------------------------------ Blog: Copyright As An Engine Of Free Expression? By Mike Masnick, Techdirt.com, May 15, 2008. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080514/0233311107.shtml I recently bought a copy of the new book by professor Neil Netanel called Copyright's Paradox. From what I've heard and seen so far, it looks like a well-balanced book that explores what's good and what's bad about copyright. ------------------------------------------ LDS Church alleges Web site violated its copyright. By Lisa Carricaburu, The Salt Lake Tribune, May 14, 2008. http://origin.sltrib.com/news/ci_9259156 A Web site that publishes anonymous submissions of difficult-to-obtain or private documents describes the LDS Church Handbook of Instructions a source sent it as significant because "the book is strictly confidential among the Mormon . . . bishops and stake presidents and it reveals the procedure of handling confidential matters related to tithing payment, excommunication, baptism and doctrine teaching [indoctrination]." The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints doesn't see anything particularly secretive or sinister about the handbook used as a reference by church leaders, but that doesn't mean it wants it to remain available on Wikileaks or Web sites operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. ------------------------------------------ Blog: How YouTube's sucking up to Modest Mouse (and other giants of media). ValleyWag.com, May 14, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/5bkge6 An eagle-eyed Valleywag tipster with a taste for Modest Mouse spotted an interesting new feature on YouTube. Uploads of music videos from the band by non-official sources now carry a link reading "Contains content from Sony BMG," which leads users to the official Modest Mouse page on the site. ------------------------------------------ New Canadian copyright bill on downloading delayed. CTV/The Canadian Press, May 14, 2008. http://tinyurl.com/4w7kl4 It looks like Canadians may have to wait at least a few more months to find out if they will be allowed to legally copy compacts discs, record television shows, or rip music to their MP3 players. ------------------------------------------ Blog: Royalty Logic Seeks To Prove Copyright Board Unconstitutional. By Eliot Van Buskirk, WiredBlogNetwork, May 14, 2008. http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/disgruntled-web.html Just when record labels thought it was safe to start charging webcasters on a per-listener, per-song basis, the US Copyright Royalty Board that set the rates has been charged unconstitutional in the Federal Court of Appeals. ------------------------------------------ Freedom Fighter of the Digital Age. By Caroline Yates, Epoch Times, May 13, 2008. http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-5-13/70552.html As music, movies and books move further into the digital realm, the question of our freedoms being diminished was raised by Richard Stallman at Cambridge University on April 30th at his talk on "Copyright vs. Community". Stallman, a legendary software developer and free software activist, argued that current copyright laws are an attack on individual freedom, are not beneficial to social progress and are unacceptable. ========== (c)ollectanea Blog. Collected perspectives on copyright. http://chaucer.umuc.edu/blogcip/collectanea/ -- Get the Feed (c) Monopoly: Playing the innovation game -- May 28-30, 2008 http://www.umuc.edu/CIP2008 -- REGISTER TODAY! Center for Intellectual Property, UMUC
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
In the News, Jack Boeve | Thread | 08' Symposium: online and in Second, Olga Francois |
08' Symposium: online and in Second, Olga Francois | Date | Google Book Search Bibliography, Ve, Charles W. Bailey, J |
Month |