Subject: Re: [stella] 6507 vs. 6502 From: Nick S Bensema <nickb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:04:48 -0700 (MST) |
>Greg miller writes about the jmp (indirect) instruction: >> >> Small note: I'm not sure about the 6507, but the 6502 and many of its variants >> won't work properly, if a pointer in the table crosses a 256-byte page >> boundary. Make sure your tables are either word-aligned or don't cross pages, >> unless someone (Jim?) knows for sure whether the 6507 has this bug. > >The 6507 is *exactly* the same chip as the 6502 except it's put into a >package with fewer pins to save a few cents on plastic and circuit board >real estate. It has the same bugs and undocumented instructions ;) The questions remain of exactly which undocumented instructions? As I recall, throughout the 6502's lifetime, the undocumented opcodes changed somewhat. Do the same ones work on a six-switch 2600 as on a four-switch or 2600jr? Or 7800, even? I'd hate to have to doom prospective buyers into constantly searching thrift stores for the 2600 that will play a game using this kind of hack. Especially those who already had to make a similar search when their 7800 didn't like the Supercharger. -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[stella] 6507 vs. 6502, Jim Nitchals | Thread | Re: [stella] Re: Help with efficien, Greg Troutman |
Re: [stella] Light gun/pen, Lee Seitz | Date | Re: [stella] Light gun/pen, Robin Harbron |
Month |