re: SEG.U var declarations.
Yep, it works now that I've fixed some things. Due to making several
changes at once, I'm afraid. *slaps self on the wrist* The way I set it up
caused the whole thing to crash around the start of the kernel, where I'd
changed the wait for the timer from a bne to a bmi, causing the following
"sta vblank" to screw up as it was no longer writing 0. Oops :) So, yep
I'd vouch for the better var method as working with DASM, and furthermore,
the fact that -v3 gets past my objections to the error reporting by this
assembler. In fact, I'm growing more and more attached to the assembler -
rather like our mangy, emasculated, 3 legged, blind in one eye, deaf, dog.
He's ugly, but we love him.
Actually, DASM isn't all that bad :)
Cheers
A
PS: The dog's name is "Lucky".
>At 07:02 12.05.98 +1000, you wrote:
>>I tried Eckhard's suggestion - it SHOULD work, but for me, at least, it
>>doesn't. Anybody who finds this does work, please let me know! I
checked -
>>my BIN was 4,096 bytes, so that part is OK.
>
>I found this method in Colin's puzzle kernel sourcecode, so it
>must be working for him too. What do you mean, when you say it
>doesn't work? If DASM produces the same BIN as before, there
>shouldn't be a problem.
--
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
