Subject: Re: [stella] Elementary question From: Mark De Smet <de-smet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:44:40 -0500 (CDT) |
> Essentially OK. But if you do your timing exactly right, you don't need to > do the STA WSYNC. > That is, you have a full 76 cycles available to do your stuff, so if you use > exactly 76 cycles, you're smack bang set for starting the next scan line > without requiring the WSYNC write. That's my understanding. I agree, that if you put another 3 cycles in there, you would not need the STA WSYNC. As to using the STA WSYNC as you describe, I would do a test before trusting it. I can concieve this STA WSYNC as holding until the end of the following line, just as well as working as you describe. Has anyone filled a line like this? Mark -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Elementary question, Andrew Davie | Thread | [stella] RE: Thrust illegal opcodes, Thomas Jentzsch |
Re: [stella] Elementary question, Andrew Davie | Date | Re: [stella] I can't find it, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |