Re: [stella] ROM image classifications

Subject: Re: [stella] ROM image classifications
From: Adam Wozniak <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:35:30 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Mickey Mouse wrote:
> >How's this for an example?
> >
> ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> ><Atari2600ROM>
> ><Binary>
> >YODA4HA4HAwMDBwcPDhgYOBg4MDgcDgcDAwMHBwcPDgwcGDgwOBwOBwMDAwcHBwcHDg44OBg
> >[140 lines of base64 encoded binary data omitted]
> >AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
> ></Binary>
> ></Atari2600ROM>
> >
> 
> Perfect, except I think the tags should be as short
> and sweet as possible, it will make it easier for
> emmbedded solutions to work with them.  Many micro-
> controllers have very limited resources.  Decoding
> a deeply nested tag could be costly.

Not that the <Binary> bit is not deeply nested...

-- 
Will code for food.       http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/resume.html

adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx        http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/pgp.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/


Current Thread