Subject: Re: [stella] ROM image classifications From: Adam Wozniak <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:35:30 -0800 (PST) |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Mickey Mouse wrote: > >How's this for an example? > > > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > ><Atari2600ROM> > ><Binary> > >YODA4HA4HAwMDBwcPDhgYOBg4MDgcDgcDAwMHBwcPDgwcGDgwOBwOBwMDAwcHBwcHDg44OBg > >[140 lines of base64 encoded binary data omitted] > >AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > ></Binary> > ></Atari2600ROM> > > > > Perfect, except I think the tags should be as short > and sweet as possible, it will make it easier for > emmbedded solutions to work with them. Many micro- > controllers have very limited resources. Decoding > a deeply nested tag could be costly. Not that the <Binary> bit is not deeply nested... -- Will code for food. http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/resume.html adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://cuddlepuddle.org/~adam/pgp.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] ROM image classificati, Mickey Mouse | Thread | [stella] IRC Snaffu?, Chris Larkin |
Re: [stella] ROM image classificati, Adam Wozniak | Date | Re: [stella] ROM image classificati, Adam Wozniak |
Month |