From: "Adam Wozniak" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Paul Slocum wrote:
> > C=15 doesn't sound like it's correct in emulation either.
>
> And it's got me stumped too.
>
> It is periodic, but I can't find a tap sequence for a LFSR which even
comes
> close to approximating it.
Isn't C=15 the same as C=7, except that it operates at
CPUclock/114 instead of TIAclock/114? And I think C=7
uses the same LSFR as C=9. But the output is somehow
combined with a bit that is alternating at the same
speed. I think this is what the "div 2" means that's
listed in the table in the Stella programmer's guide.
Ciao, Eckhard Stolberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
