Subject: Re: [stella] Give me one more cycle From: Manuel Rotschkar <cybergoth@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:06:55 +0100 |
Hi there! > The last one was the use of an illegal opcode: ATX, > wich saved me 2 cycles. Oh, I just had to use LAX for the latest Seawolf kernel as well. :-) >Questions must be made: Do you thing speed is too high? >Does the islands shape suck? I think it looks still very impressive. The speed seems ok, but one can better judge once it's getting playable. > I downloaded DASM Version 2.20.07 from Andrew's site, > why doesn't support illegal opcodes? (I tried ATX, > DOP, TOP but in the end had to use the > .byte #$XX syntax) Oh, it does I think. Maybe the names/syntax is just different? I don't know about ATX and TOP, but I think it accepts "NOP 0" for DOP. I'm also using LAX and it works. As for your missing cycle: ...if you'd post the source... :-) BTW: Are you per chance reading that portuguese 2600 Yahoo group? What's going on there? Any cool projects? :-) Greetings, Manuel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[stella] Indy 500 disassembly, Glenn Saunders | Thread | RE: [stella] Give me one more cycle, Gonzalo Fernández |
Re: [stella] Cheap (but good) A/V m, John Saeger | Date | [stella] Indy 500 disassembly (firs, Glenn Saunders |
Month |