Re: XSL Trans

["James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>I wonder if the XSL transformation language should be split off and
>designed separately from the formatting objects language. It could be
>called XTrans or something.

Agreed. And excellent reasons and addressing of the issues included.
Could the "tree addressing language" also be split off as Paul and I have
suggested here before?

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx      http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network             ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School                  ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia                ( http://www.schema.net/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list