Re: XSL with scripting

[Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx]

Hi.

Could you expand a little on what contradiction you find? Some of my views
on certain issues have changed as the result of counter arguement on this
list, so I am genuinely interested if you feel you see an inconsistency.

I thought I was addressing two seperate end of the debate with regard to
concern, maybe my expression was sloppy.

Cheers
     Guy.





xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 12/23/98 04:33:31 PM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  Re: XSL with scripting




I believe that these paragraphs contradict each other:
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> If ECMAScript where included in the XSL spec there would be no need for
you
[SNIP]
...
> And if your concern is the adultaration of a simple declaritive style
[SNIP]

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list