<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6)

Subject: Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6)
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:44:15 +0700
David Schach wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor.
> 
> > How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)?
> >
> Yes when it is used in a select or test.  foo/id(@ref)  is interpreted as
> id(foo/@ref).  I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used
> in a match.

It would match an element that's referred to by a foo element's ref
attribute.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (, David Schach Thread Questions on the new XSL spec (sect, Steve Dahl
RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (, David Schach Date Template Rule Conflict Resolution, Paul Spencer
Month