|
Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:01:35 +0000 |
Hi Oren.
The MS XSL parser has <xsl:cdata> doing as you describe.
Whether MS is inovating or anticipating here is as always an interesting
point. Is anybody running a book of odds on these issues? I figure the list
as a collective could make some tidy money on the side ::cough:: maybe not.
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/13/99 10:17:52 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: Re: GOTCHA!
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[SNIP]
Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may get
<xsl:cdata>?
Have fun,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
| Mixed content transformation, Paul_Tihansky | Date | Re: XSL and HTML, Guy_Murphy |
| Month |