|
Subject: Re: Existing XSL processors From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:22:49 +0000 |
Hi Anette.
The second part is pretty much up to the browsers. You can output pretty
much aything you want (as long as it's well formed) as long as your target
browser will support it, and render it. At the moment that leaves us pretty
much with HTML and/or XML w/CSS. The second part is more an issue of agreed
output than anything.
There might be a proof of concept browser/application out there somewhere
that supports formatting object as per the current XSL spec, but not in
wide circulation. Anybody seen such a beast?
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 01/14/99 07:22:51 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: Existing XSL processors
Reading the XSL Draft of the w3 consortium it is said:
"XSL is a lnaguage for expressing stylsheets. It consists of two parts:
1. a language for transforming XML documents, and
2. an XML vocabulary for specifiying formatting semantics"
So far I had a look at XSL engines which implement the first part.
Is there by any chance a XSL engine, which implements
the second part too?
Regards
Anette
anette.engel@xxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz | Thread | Re: Existing XSL processors, Chris Lilley |
| Re: XSL and HTML, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, James Clark |
| Month |