|
Subject: Fw: XSL macros stronger then XSLT From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:29:16 +0200 |
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>according to sec 13 a variable can have value any type allowed in an
>XSLT expression. I think the idea is that instead of the old contents
>form you use a named parameter and then grab its value with
><xsl:copy-of select="$paramname" />
Hey, neat idea - Silly me, I never thought of using <xsl:copy-of> to get at
a variable containing a node set. Unfortunately, XT does not support this.
When I tried the following:
<xsl:template name="Wrapper">
<xsl:element name="W">
<xsl:copy-of select="$Content"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="C">
<xsl:call-template name="Wrapper">
<xsl:param name="Content">
<xsl:attribute name="B">b value</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:param>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:template>
I got the following error message:
DID NOT EXPECT cannot convert to node-set
I hope this is just a problem in XT (the current version is clearly marked
as a beta, it is to be expected that there are some glitches). Well, that's
what beta testers are for :-)
Have fun,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: XSL macros stronger then XSLT, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Fw: XSL macros stronger then XS, David Carlisle |
| RE: Dinky little XML and XSL GIFs f, Mike Dierken | Date | RE: < and >, Sharmila Pandith |
| Month |