Subject: Re: CSS and XSL? From: James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 12:27:39 +0800 |
> Let XSLT go on at their own pace, but make FOs work in a way > that builds on CSS rather than clumsily attempting to squash it. > > I can't say I approve of formatting objects period, but having formatting > objects use a different vocabulary from that used in formatting annotation > seems remarkably foolish. I have been somewhat confused by statements like the above that have been made recently. My reading of the XSL spec suggests that XSL FOs very much build on CSS and go to great lengths to use the same vocabulary. I don't know what has given people the impression that this is not the case. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: CSS and XSL?, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: CSS and XSL?, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: XSL/CSS = XTL and XFO, Totolaricot | Date | xslj, tables and background colors, Dehne, Patrick |
Month |