|
Subject: Re: XSLT vs JSP From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:22:05 -0400 |
Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> 1) JSP decided to leverage existing languages, like Java and JavaScript. So
> the number of extra tags is small. XSLT decided to create yet another
> programming language. So it adds a number of new tags and significant
> complexity to the pattern language. Also, XSLT has lost the orthogonality
> between the pattern language ('XQL') and the transformation langue
> (xsl:template, etc.)
What does that mean? How are they not orthogonal?
--
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
Software is largely a service industry operating under the persistent
but unfounded delusion that it is a manufacturing industry.
-- Eric Raymond, "The Magic Cauldron: The Manufacturing Delusion"
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/magic-cauldron/magic-cauldron.html
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: XSLT vs JSP, Don Park | Thread | RE: XSLT vs JSP, Jonathan Borden |
| Re: XSLT vs JSP, James Tauber | Date | RE: XSLT vs JSP, Don Park |
| Month |