Re: FO DTD from XSL WD.

Subject: Re: FO DTD from XSL WD.
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:58:08 +0800
> Hovewer, I don't like when some system silently ignores my errors.
>
> It may be the issue of taste.

If so, I share your taste, however:

1. putting a property on a formatting object with no descendants that are
ever going to use it is not an error (although it would be nice if it
triggered a warning)

2. FOP is still alpha and I've been working on increasing functionality and
getting the underlying architecture right before comprehensive error
handling. Because FOP implements inheritance as "pull from ancestor" rather
than "push to descendant", it would take a fair bit of work to check for
unused definitions of property values.

James



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread