RE: XSL controversy

Subject: RE: XSL controversy
From: Noah Booth <noahb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 10:35:08 -0700
> - XSLT is better at down translations that up translations; if your
> transformation is going from a less-structured form to a more-structured
> form, XSLT may not be a good choice

Hi everyone,
 I'm using XSLT for importing data from (very unstructred) HTML pages into
(well structured) XML. Although I agree that XSLT is better going the other
direction, I've found that XSLT is excellent for my application. The XSLT
code simpler and easier to understand than it would be in a procedural
language. 

- noah


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread