Subject: RE: XSL controversy From: Noah Booth <noahb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 10:35:08 -0700 |
> - XSLT is better at down translations that up translations; if your > transformation is going from a less-structured form to a more-structured > form, XSLT may not be a good choice Hi everyone, I'm using XSLT for importing data from (very unstructred) HTML pages into (well structured) XML. Although I agree that XSLT is better going the other direction, I've found that XSLT is excellent for my application. The XSLT code simpler and easier to understand than it would be in a procedural language. - noah XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL controversy, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | RE: XSL controversy, James Robertson |
Re: XSL controversy, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | RE: XSL controversy, Didier PH Martin |
Month |