|
Subject: Re: Generating TOCs or overviews? From: Kai.Grossjohann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kai Großjohann) Date: 27 Aug 1999 17:37:55 +0200 |
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > But somehow, this doesn't seem to be the right way.
>
> but it is the right way:-)
He :-)
Does the concatenation have to be smart or will /usr/bin/cat do? Can
the complete files be concatenated, XML declaration and DOCTYPE
declaration and all?
I could think of two alternatives to doing this:
(1) Run each XML file through XT, creating shorter XML files
containing only the interesting elements. Then, concat all the
shorter XML files and run the result through XT again (with
another style sheet).
(2) Concat the long XML and run them through XT just once (with a
single style sheet which does both the selection and
transformation-to-HTML jobs).
(Is style sheet a good term something which specifies transformation,
not formatting?)
I wonder whether there is a difference in efficiency?
kai
--
I like BOTH kinds of music.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Generating TOCs or overviews?, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Generating TOCs or overviews?, David Carlisle |
| Re: importing text-source in a xsl-, Tony Graham | Date | DOM object to input source for XT a, Sebastien Sahuc |
| Month |