Subject: Re: choose to define conditional attributes? From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 17:35:20 +0700 |
Kay Michael wrote: > Oh! Is that a definitive interpretation? (a) "Containing" surely allows an > ancestor as well as a parent, (b) I thought it was talking about the result > tree not the stylesheet tree. > > In SAXON I allow xsl:attribute to add an attribute to an element created > using an ancestor literal result element in the source stylesheet, or even > an element created using a different template (i.e. you can do an > xsl:call-template to a template that contains the xsl:attribute). The only > constraint is that the element in the result tree must be open and must not > have had any character content added to it. That's the intended interpretation. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: choose to define conditional at, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Using CDATA but still "<" is, Kay Michael |
Re: choose to define conditional at, David Carlisle | Date | How to unsubscribe (and other usefu, XSL-List Owner |
Month |