Subject: Re: FO samples at www.renderx.com From: pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Schafer) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 04:56:32 GMT |
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:58:34 -0700, you wrote: >Please note that any element that may have #PCDATA children may >also get no children at all: THIS IS AN XML LAW. Okay, I can accept that. It remains to be seen what the XSL WD authors really mean by that pseudo-DTD, of course. >Sure, this is not very accurate; now that you have pointed this out, >we have corrected the tescases using margin-bottom instead. Yes, this would seem to be the "proper" approach. >Thanks indeed for looking into the tests; we are pleased to see >people using them. Thank you for providing them. [I apologize for taking so long to reply; I've been swamped with work lately.] -Steve XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL and XSLT, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: FO samples at www.renderx.com, Steve Schafer |
XSL and XSLT, Anurak Theanpurmpul | Date | Re: XSL and XSLT, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Month |