Subject: Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Right From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 10:38:00 +0100 (BST) |
Nikolai Grigoriev writes: > to names. For some historical reasons, an element that generates > three adjacent area-containers in the inline-progression-direction > is called "a table" (or, rather, <fo:table> ;-)). If the functionality is > exactly what you want, does it really matter what is the label fair point, I guess. > It seems to me that, for robustness' sake, we should create three > consecutive block-areas for left, center, and right part. You can > create them by placing three fo:inline-included-containers on the > line (one more solution ;-)) or by absolutely aligned fo:blocks > (yet another solution ;-)). But, won't it be simpler to use tables? My resolve is crumbling. I can see that I may have to return to tables Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Ri, Stephen Deach | Thread | Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Ri, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Ri, David Carlisle | Date | Re: XSL:FO: Left ... Center ... Ri, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |