|
Subject: Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 10:40:43 +0100 (BST) |
> But why would you want to: > > XML -> XSL -> XSL:FO -> MIF -> Frame -> PDF > > When you could just go: > > XML -> MIF -> Frame -> PDF So that I would have a choice of formatter. XSL:FO would give me a stable formatting point. Yes, I know there was the argument last week about how precise FO should be, but I still see virtues in thinking/writing in a common medium/low-level formatting language Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, James Robertson | Thread | Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, James Tauber |
| RE: XSL and the DOM, Kay Michael | Date | Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, James Tauber |
| Month |