| 
 
Subject: Re: Is there a public W3C Specification XSLT? From: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:40:19 +0100  | 
James Tauber wrote: > > > The ones used for the XSLT and XPath Recs are at: > > > > ftp://ftp.jclark.com/pub/xml/xmlspec.xsl > > ftp://ftp.jclark.com/pub/xml/xpath.xsl > > ftp://ftp.jclark.com/pub/xml/xslt.xsl > > But these are for xmlspec -> HTML, right? > > I think Stefano wanted xmlspec -> FO, which is what I have made a first pass > at. > > Actually I used the above XSLT. With a little bit of tweaking I ran my > HTML -> FO stylesheet over your xmlspec -> HTML stylesheet to get a > xmlspec -> FO stylesheet. The approach worked surprisingly well (it > surprised me that it worked, anyway) Well, it's surely a nice hack, but I think you get much more power in handling directly Spec structures (unless your HTML is totally style-free and then it could be seen as a structure language, rather than a layout language). Anyway, James (T), do you have that Spec->FO stylesheet public? -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. <stefano@xxxxxxxxxx> Friedrich Nietzsche XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: Is there a public W3C Specifica, James Tauber | Thread | Re: Is there a public W3C Specifica, James Tauber | 
| Re: Problems selecting attribues, Steve Tinney | Date | RE: Storing a reference to a node, DPawson | 
| Month |