|
Subject: Re: xt pipeline From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 13:06:40 +0800 |
> I've found through hard experience that
> XSLT modulization best occurs by using
> intermediate forms.
That's my experience too. I've found it particularly useful with documents
to go from content-based markup to structure-based markup with one
stylesheet and structure-based markup to presentation-based markup with
another.
eg
<Abstract>blah blah</Abstract>
becomes
<Section>
<Title>Abstract</Title>
blah blah
</Section>
becomes
<div>
<h2>Abstract</h2>
blah blah
</div>
I used to (with early XSLT drafts) also do a lot of generation of
stylesheets from documents, so stylesheet A would be applied to document B
to get stylesheet C that would then be applied to document B to get document
D. I found I don't have to do that any more, as XSLT became more powerful.
> I was wondering if anyone has hooked xt to itself.
SAXON can do it, I believe. I haven't come across anyone who has gotten XT
to do it.
James Tauber
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| xt pipeline, Clark C. Evans | Thread | Re: xt pipeline, Stefano Mazzocchi |
| Re: XSLT-Based Websites, Duane Nickull | Date | Re: XSLT-Based Websites, James Tauber |
| Month |