Subject: RE: Processor Performance From: "WYSOCKI Adalbert" <waldi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:34:53 +0100 |
We did not performed tests using XP because our Business object model uses and does need DOM structure whereas XP can not handle it and do not generate it. What is about validations: Any of our tests did use validation in parsing. I forgot to maintion this whereas it is very influent for performance test. Apache's Xerces and Xalan have integrated LotusXSL and IBM parser keeping their architecture so test performed using Xalan and Xerces should show IBM tools performances. Adalbert -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 3:59 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Processor Performance Very interesting, especially the difference between IBM and Oracle parsers. But I don't see an entry for XT + XP? How does that compare? were all the other tests run with a validating parser? Another point to look at is memory usage. I simply cannot run my test file with some processors, because I run out of memory. Seebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Processor Performance, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Processor Performance, Paul Levin |
Re: count, Paul Levin | Date | DESIGINING styleshets that act like, Jonathan Asbell |
Month |