Subject: Re: error in http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xsl-20000112 or am I misunderstanding? [RE-POST] From: eljefe@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jeff Caruso) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 21:59:52 -0500 |
Unfortunately this bounced the first time I sent it. I'm re-posting it mainly for completeness, even though the new draft supersedes the cited text. --Jeff C ================================================================== Louis-Dominique Dubeau <ldd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hello fellow XSLers, > >I'm reading the XSL specs. (I've read XSLT specs already). I believe >I have found some errors in the section that deals with defining the >term "consecutively follows". Thanks, Louis-Dominique. You are correct, the reverse relation is described in points 3 and 6 due to a typo. This was noticed by someone else and has led to corrections which appear in the forthcoming public draft. Regards, -- Jeff Caruso ****************************************************************** Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <eljefe@xxxxxxxxxxx> <jcaruso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Bitstream, Inc. 215 First St Cambridge, MA 02142 (617)520-8366 ****************************************************************** Dr. Jeffrey L. Caruso <eljefe@xxxxxxxxxxx> <jcaruso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Bitstream, Inc. 215 First St Cambridge, MA 02142 (617)520-8366 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Inheritance Model (was: XSL-fo), Nikolai Grigoriev | Thread | New XSL working draft available, Vincent Quint |
Re: Relationship between XSLT and A, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | Re: Inheritance Model (was: XSL-fo), Stephen Deach |
Month |