Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark From: Jonathan Asbell <jonathana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:22:10 -0500 |
I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl. Obviously we all need the fastest method, yet one that follows standards. Please advise (the silent mediator) -----Original Message----- From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 12:39 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark Didier PH Martin wrote: > So Paul, Omnimark is nearer to XSLT concepts than PERL. To compare PERL with > XSLT is like comparing potatoes with oranges but comparing Omnimark to XSLT > is like comparing two kinds of oranges. > Actually, comparing XSLT to OmniMark is like comparing an orange tree to a bunch of oranges coming down a high speed assembly line, but I digress... :-) Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs Omnimark, Vincent Bernat | Thread | RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, Didier PH Martin |
Formatting Objects and their proper, violet wright | Date | RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, Didier PH Martin |
Month |