Subject: Re: XSL Theory From: disco <disco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:30:49 -0500 (EST) |
> There is probably a sub-set of XML where the transformations should be > provable. A subset of XSLT, you mean. You can still do arbitrarily complicated things to the simplest of data sets. And yes, there is such a subset, but it might not be a *useful* subset, which is where the interesting part lies. > Any experts on graph theory on the list? Doing this kind of work > is outside my abilities but I'd love to read a paper on this. I'm not sure graph theory is what you're looking for. "Complexity classes" is the branch of CS theory this falls under. But like I said, my prof couldn't teach the stuff worth a damn, so I only have a limited understanding of the stuff... > I also think this would be of value in the ecommerce world. You wouldn't > want a server-side transformation to accidentally charge your credit card > twice for a book. I'm not sure how that fits in... Curious what you meant :) Dan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL Theory, Jon Smirl | Thread | Re: XSL Theory, Jon Smirl |
Re: xsl for formatting, Chuck White | Date | Re: XSL Theory, Jon Smirl |
Month |