Re: XSL Theory

Subject: Re: XSL Theory
From: disco <disco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:30:49 -0500 (EST)
> There is probably a sub-set of XML where the transformations should be
> provable.

A subset of XSLT, you mean. You can still do arbitrarily complicated
things to the simplest of data sets. And yes, there is such a subset, but
it might not be a *useful* subset, which is where the interesting part
lies.

> Any experts on graph theory on the list? Doing this kind of work
> is outside my abilities but I'd love to read a paper on this.

I'm not sure graph theory is what you're looking for. "Complexity classes"
is the branch of CS theory this falls under. But like I said, my prof
couldn't teach the stuff worth a damn, so I only have a limited
understanding of the stuff...

> I also think this would be of value in the ecommerce world. You wouldn't
> want a server-side transformation to accidentally charge your credit card
> twice for a book.

I'm not sure how that fits in... Curious what you meant :)

Dan


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • XSL Theory
    • Jon Smirl - Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:17:40 -0500
      • disco - Thu, 9 Mar 2000 16:10:18 -0500 (EST)
        • Jon Smirl - Thu, 9 Mar 2000 16:25:17 -0500
          • disco - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:30:49 -0500 (EST) <=
          • Jon Smirl - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:39:59 -0500
          • disco - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:05:09 -0500 (EST)
          • Steve Schafer - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:38:17 -0600
          • Jon Smirl - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:22:53 -0500