| 
 
Subject: Re: XSL Theory From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:12:46 -0500  | 
From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Also, even if the stylesheet is correct, provably or not, some valid > instances of schema A may not be transformable into valid instances of > schema B. For example, an element in schema B may be required, but be > optional in A, and not present in a particular instance of A. This is the sort of thing a schema prover should pick up on. To be correct the stylesheet would need to detect the missing element and generate a default value or error condition. Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
 
 
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: XSL Theory, Jeff Greif | Thread | Re: XSL Theory, Christopher R. Maden | 
| Re: XSL Theory, Jeff Greif | Date | Re: XSL Theory, Steve Schafer | 
| Month |