RE: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each

Subject: RE: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:08:37 -0000
> Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset()
> [undocumented]

Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java method
names all hyphens  are ignored, so you can happily write n---odese---t() if
it takes your fancy. I documented it as node-set because that's the usual
XSLT way of spelling it.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread