Re: XSL FO conformance

[Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rick Geimer writes:
 > 
 > > a) why is <table-footer> extended, but
 > > <table-header> basic? why would anyone be able to implement one but
 > > not the other?
 > 
 > Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table
 > model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is
 > considered an extended feature. 

XSL is targetting the sad tired old world of word-processing software?
god help us....

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list