Subject: Re: XSL FO conformance From: "Rick Geimer" <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:19:57 -0700 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > Rick Geimer writes: > > Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table > > model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is > > considered an extended feature. > > XSL is targetting the sad tired old world of word-processing software? > god help us.... Actually, all I was trying to do was point out that many, if not the majority of formating solutions out there don't do table footers. It would seem a little harsh to exclude all of them as possible XSL-FO renderers because of the lack of this feature. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL FO conformance, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: XSL FO conformance, Paul Grosso |
Re: XSL FO conformance, Marcus Carr | Date | Type of an <xsl:param>, Jeff Lansing |
Month |